Back to Case Studies

Field Photo Triage AI

National Property Restoration Network · Field Services

A multimodal triage system for damage photos, field notes, and scope preparation.

The measured result

-52%
Estimate Prep Time
+27%
First-Visit Fix Rate
-38%
Senior Reviewer Load

Engagement snapshot

Mandate
Speed up early scoping without letting image interpretation become an unsafe automation shortcut.
Timeline
13 weeks from data prep to three-region deployment.
Team shape
Operations VP, 1 computer vision engineer, 2 full-stack engineers, and 6 field reviewers.

The problem

Estimators waited on senior reviewers to interpret water and fire damage photos before deciding what crews, materials, and inspection steps should go first.

What we built

Deployed a multimodal triage layer that tagged visible damage patterns, proposed scope starters, and flagged image sets that needed human review before dispatch.

Operating context

The company served a large geographic footprint with variable field staff experience. Early scoping delays created slower dispatch and expensive second visits when the first crew arrived underprepared.

Key constraints

  • Photo quality varied heavily across contractors, lighting conditions, and mobile devices.
  • No automated recommendation could skip mandatory moisture, safety, or hazard inspection steps.
  • The system had to explain what it saw well enough for estimators to trust or reject it quickly.

What we built

  1. Multimodal evidence parsing

    Combined image interpretation with field-note text and job metadata before proposing scope hints.

  2. Category-specific recommendations

    Separated water, smoke, mold, and structural cues so scope suggestions stayed tied to the actual damage class.

  3. Reviewer-in-the-loop controls

    Required signoff on low-confidence photo sets and surfaced visible rationale for every suggested next step.

Delivery path

  1. Training data curation

    Selected representative job photo sets across damage types, lighting conditions, and device quality to avoid brittle performance.

  2. Estimator workflow fit

    Designed outputs around the estimator intake screen rather than a separate AI dashboard.

  3. Dispatch feedback loop

    Tracked whether crew dispatch recommendations reduced second visits and scope corrections after deployment.

Why it mattered

The system reduced the time to a credible first scope and helped standardize work between experienced and less experienced teams. The biggest operational value came from better prepared first dispatches.

Implementation notes

  • Multimodal systems need explicit fallback behavior for poor image quality, not just better models.
  • Visual explanations and tagged evidence materially improved estimator trust.
  • Scoping speed only mattered because the dispatch workflow consumed the recommendations immediately.

Start a Similar Plan

Start a Similar Plan