Back to Case Studies

Multilingual Support Coach

B2B Workforce SaaS · SaaS

A retrieval-grounded reply drafting and QA assistant for global support teams operating in multiple languages.

The measured result

-29%
Escalation Rate
+34%
QA Score
+17%
First Contact Resolution

Engagement snapshot

Mandate
Improve answer quality across regions without turning support into a blind automation project.
Timeline
11 weeks across two support regions, then phased global expansion.
Team shape
Support operations manager, knowledge lead, 2 engineers, and 8 multilingual reps.

The problem

Support teams in five regions gave uneven answers because core documentation and release notes were English-first and reps had inconsistent access to product nuance.

What we built

Built a Zendesk-embedded support coach that drafted localized responses, exposed knowledge citations, and enforced escalation when confidence or policy boundaries were weak.

Operating context

Product complexity had outgrown macros and internal notes. High-performing reps could still solve tickets, but regional variance created avoidable escalations and uneven customer experience.

Key constraints

  • Drafts had to stay within approved product and policy guidance.
  • Terminology and translated phrasing needed to stay consistent release to release.
  • Sensitive billing or account actions had to route to humans every time.

What we built

  1. Knowledge-grounded drafting

    Paired retrieval with templated answer structures so the model worked from current release notes and product docs.

  2. Translation memory

    Stored validated phrasing for critical product terminology to reduce drift across languages.

  3. Confidence routing

    Blocked aggressive answer generation on edge cases and surfaced clear escalation paths instead.

Delivery path

  1. Support corpus cleanup

    Normalized help content, release notes, and macro libraries so retrieval quality improved before drafting began.

  2. Regional pilot

    Tested in two regions with side-by-side QA scoring against manually written responses.

  3. Global rollout

    Added admin tooling for article freshness, terminology updates, and per-language performance review.

Why it mattered

The system improved rep consistency more than raw speed. Teams used it as a high-trust drafting and answer-check layer, which meant better answers reached customers faster with fewer unnecessary escalations.

Implementation notes

  • Multilingual quality is as much a knowledge problem as a translation problem.
  • Support teams adopt faster when the system critiques and guides, not just drafts.
  • Fresh release-note indexing mattered every bit as much as prompt quality.

Start a Similar Plan

Start a Similar Plan