Back to Case Studies

Shift Callout Backfill Flow

Packaged Foods Manufacturer · Manufacturing

An absence and backfill workflow that evaluates skills, overtime rules, and response order automatically.

The measured result

17 minutes -> 3 minutes
Shift Fill Time
-18%
Overtime Overspend
-61%
Supervisor Interruptions

Engagement snapshot

Mandate
Automate the repetitive backfill work without violating labor rules or supervisor control.
Timeline
8 weeks from policy mapping to floor deployment.
Team shape
Plant manager, HR lead, 2 automation engineers, and 4 shift supervisors.

The problem

Supervisors handled shift callouts through texts and phone trees, making coverage slow and overtime costs unpredictable.

What we built

Built an attendance exception flow that evaluated union rules, skill requirements, overtime caps, and response order before sending shift offers.

Operating context

The plant could usually cover absences, but the process was noisy and manager-dependent. A single callout kicked off a burst of texts, calls, and ad hoc decisions that pulled supervisors away from the floor.

Key constraints

  • Union and overtime rules had to be enforced deterministically.
  • Skill requirements varied by line and shift type.
  • Supervisors needed override control for exceptional cases.

What we built

  1. Policy-driven offer engine

    Ranked eligible employees using labor rules, certifications, overtime status, and shift needs.

  2. Response and escalation flow

    Issued offers in the correct sequence and escalated only when the normal path failed.

  3. Supervisor control layer

    Kept override and visibility with supervisors while removing the repetitive outreach burden.

Delivery path

  1. Labor rule mapping

    Translated union agreements and plant policies into a sequence the system could apply consistently.

  2. Pilot line deployment

    Tested on one production area to validate backfill accuracy and manager trust.

  3. Plant rollout

    Expanded across lines and shift types while tracking fill time and overtime behavior.

Why it mattered

The flow saved supervisor time because it handled the repetitive offer logic instantly while preserving rule compliance. Coverage became faster, and overtime decisions became more consistent because the process stopped depending on who was on shift.

Implementation notes

  • Shift automation lives or dies on labor rule fidelity.
  • Supervisors accept automation faster when they keep final override authority.
  • The operational gain came from removing interruptions, not just from faster messaging.

Start a Similar Plan

Start a Similar Plan